Sienna Miller & Balthazar Getty Leaving The Groucho Club
Sep 2, 2008 AT 10:56 am
Sienna Miller and her new boyfriend Balthazar Getty were photographed leaving the Groucho Club in London last night and from the looks of it, Sienna wasn't too happy about having her picture taken. She's gotten a lot of flack for dating the married Balthazar and supposedly breaking up their marriage. I'm curious how you all feel about her? Do you believe that the couple was separated prior to Sienna coming into the picture?
Photos by WENN
39 Comments
For Email Marketing you can trust
|
User login
Top Stories
Who's online
There are currently 6 users and 606 guests online.
New Forums & Blogs Started By You
Newsletter Sign Up
Media Categories
INO Departments
More INO
- Powered by
Drupal - Programming by
As If Productions
Buy An INO T Shirt
Picture Of The Day
Fashion Finds
Let's Get Personal
Hot Photos
Syndicate
Im betting the only 2 that knew the getty's were separated were the husband and the gf.
Is she wearing Paris Hilton's shoes?
I agree with duda -- and Sienna is major sleazy... You need to get inoculated against weird stuff to be safe with her!
Uh, Vera? Did you not read the comments posted on the last Sienna Miller post. The consensus seems to be that she is a homewrecking whore.
she didn't hold a gun to his head and force him to cheat on his wife. Why is she getting all the heat, when he had just as much to do with it?
Heck no. Those kind of separations make the media pretty quick, and there was no hint of them being separated, in fact, they'd just recently had a baby and he was making statements to the media about loving his family life etc. Classic spin control. They really have no excuse other than the truth, and they are desparately trying to improve their images.
I said it before and I will say it again here... if you are "sleeping on friends' couches" then it is because your "separation" is anything but permanent. If Balthazar has the money to be going back and forth to Italy and England, then he has the money for a hotel or an apartment. When you are sleeping on friend's couches, then you are planning to return home at any time. Give me a break. If she had done this once (breaking up a marriage) then we could call it a mistake. But twice so far, this is a habit. She is a total skank, homewrecker, and a ho. And he is a douche and a half. I cannot believe he would humiliate his wife and his children like this.
With all due respect, but the perception that sleeping on friends couches means "this is not permanent" is your personal opinion, not a rational fact. Whatever happened to Getty's marriage, only the two people involved know. Nonetheless, Sienna and Balty are completely classless, his marriage being already over or not.
I love Sienna. I think the marriage was long over. It's so crazy the way people rip her to shreds over it.
I think what rubs me the wrong way about Sienna (and their whole situation for that matter) is that all of a sudden she just pops up naked all over the place, stuck to the guy like white on rice. How long could he have possibly been separated for? And when you're in a new relationship, who just jumps right to the "topless on vacation for weeks on end" phase? She splashed her own naked body all over the place and with that in mind, I do believe she's getting what she deserved.
Why is it the "woman" is always to blame? If she is single she is not the one "cheating". The man is the one who should be blamed. Why can't they just walk away? We as women need to see it for what it is, weak men who don't care. If it wasn't Sienna Miller, it would just be someone else. Who knows, it probably already was.
Women have a responsibility to each other. And if it is just about "weak men" then shouldn't she be the "strong woman" and make a stand against effing a married man? She made a decision. She has done this before, and it is definitely a pattern of a single woman with no conscience. If you are married, then it tends to create an entirely different perspective. She wanted to be in the public eye, so when she behaves like a tramp over and over again, she cannot expect to be immune from criticism.
I agree with everything you just said -- especially this statement: " Women have a responsibility to each other."
may we break for a moment and talk about the fact that she's wearing white keds?
I agree with Anastasia, and Jo Jo Totally. She has done this before!! She's done this to herself!
eh, with legs like that its no wonder men cant resist her. while i couldnt be with a married a man, he's the one doing bad, not her. give her a break.
If she doesn't like being called a **** then perhaps she should stop sleeping with married me. Just a suggestion.
Being the fact that she had been cheated on with the nanny, when she was dating Jude Law you would think she wouldn't do it to someone else. It's tasteless at best
nice shoes to wear to a club! she is so ugly! why is she famous? homeless is more like it!
I think that it is really dirty to down someone's looks. I am sure you are not the cutest thing in the world. And there is no telling the stuff that you have gotten into through your life. So again, those who live in glasses houses should not throw stones.
None of us knows what was going on. The only facts we have are that BG and SM are invovled, and that BG gave a statement that he was separated from his wife when he became involved with Sienna. No one (including his wife or her friends) has contradicted this. Surely someone would have contradicted if he had made up the separation? Or maybe I've not heard it. The silence may very well be her using good judgment and reserving her allegations for the legal battle. Sienna is one of those women who has a certain quality about her that seems to attract men who are in troubled relationships. It would be easy to quip that her "quality" is promiscuity, but I think there is something more. She is a very carefree individual (irresponsible, even) and her freeedom is probably very attractive to men with a lot of children at home who feel confined by their responsibilities (Jude Lawe, BG). This doesn't exculpate her, I just think that there is more to this scenario than her attacking families. Sienna is in the wrong but I do feel sorry for her because she seems oblivious to how destructive are her choices. I think dating a married guy is wrong because it complicates matters for everyone, and precludes a "healthy" reconciliation or even divorce for the married couple (and certainly the new couple cannot build a good relationship going forward). But the venom that is reserved for Sienna is interesting. It seems to imply that some women believe that we have some sort of allegiance to one another simply by virtue of our gender...a duty we have to one another that men (including our significant others) do not have to us. I don't share this feeling. Oh, I would despise the woman who dated my husband (even if we were separated) but it would mostly be jealousy and insecurity on my part--I would hold him responsible completely for the betrayal.
We should have an allegiance to each other as human beings, and we should remember to "do unto others" and have a conscience. It is not as simple as implied... that a bunch of venom-filled unsophisticated women simply place all the blame on the other woman. Not that simple at all.
Anastasia... you are my hero.
I certainly didn't intend to imply that anyone who is angry at Sienna in unsophisticated, and if I did I apologize. I am genuinely curious about what I was observing, which had the tenor of a betrayal amongst a ... sisterhood. I believe all humans, irrespective of gender, race or age, owe one another good treatment and honesty (allegiance to all seems improbable). That's why I just don't understand why the hate seems more acid for Sienna. I am certain she is in the wrong, and so is he, so why the special hate for her? I don't get the impression that the women who feel this hate are jealous of Sienna -- far from it -- so why does she get under everyone's skin more than the father of four who shrugged his shoulders at the responsibility he owes to the four human lives he committed to raise? It's a real phenomenon, and worht examining. Do the actions of a Sienna-type (carefree, fun, free of obligation and responsbility) particularly enrage us because we, as women, continue to take most of the responsbility in our homes to develop a family? Is it because she has never been married and couldn't possibly understand the commitment and strain that are present in every marriage (and particularly one with four children) and seems to have no appreciation for the scope of the damage she is causing? Would people feel less caustic if the other woman had been married? If she had children? Is it Sienna's ignorance?
Embee said: "None of us knows what was going on. The only facts we have are that BG and SM are invovled, and that BG gave a statement that he was separated from his wife when he became involved with Sienna. No one (including his wife or her friends) has contradicted this." That's not true- Rosetta's camp (Getty's wife) informed "People" that she and Getty had not separated before he had an affair with Sienna (right after the topless photos came out). And Getty himself denied that he was separated approximately two weeks before those same pics. Sienna's camp said Getty had separated from his wife for six months (as of July), but Getty was photographed with Rosetta at a public event in April 2008. Part of the reason for this backlash is that it's so obvious that Getty and Sienna are lying. I think Sienna deserves every bit of the scorn she's receiving after all the public whining she did when Jude Law cheated on her. The only part I'm confused about is that people are not blaming Getty more- ultimately he was the married one with a family to protect. He's more of a sk*nk ho than she is (even if she looks the part in these and other recent photos).
Who are you kidding...they're both skunks.
embee- i agree completely. to believe a system of "allegiance" to one another is (or should be) sufficient puts the emphasis on the wrong party. if your husband, boyfriend, whomever, has the capability to stray (emotionally or physically) i do not believe it has very much to do with anything you could have done or anything that "she" did. it's HIS situation. if it wasn't sienna, it would have been someone else. i'm not saying she doesn't make destructive decisions and that she's free from any shame- but there's always going to be "that" girl... someone who appears to pose a sweeter deal or a different way to be and if he doesn't see the good in whatever it is that he already has it's a done deal. women do it all the time- we have temptations, but we rationalize that what we already have, and have worked for, is worth way more in the end. period. guys need to be able to do that too (many do!) and if they just can't manage to be adults, cut your losses sooner rather than later. i'm sorry but i will never "put my hands in the fire" for someone else, as they say. i will never depend on a system of owing one another to ensure my man doesn't leave me for someone else. there's a better way, and that is putting the responsibility on him- and only him. he owes his loyalty to you and your family. "she" owes you nothing.
tter what we think. This is personal between her and him and none of our buisness. Those who live n glass houses should not throw stones. Nobody is perfect.
That's right! "He who lives in glass house...........dress in basement."
i don't think anyone but the couple truly know the timing of when their marriage was officially over. what i don't understand is why an actress who could be dating a number of hot single men, would choose a father of young children who is estranged from his wife. that sounds way too messy when there are plenty of other fish in the sea. something tells me this woman likes the controversy surrounding her choice of male companions.
Post new comment